Frequency of Congenital Anomalies in Newborns and Its Relation to Maternal Health in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan


  • Adnan Khan Undergraduate student (MBBS). Rehman Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Zuhaid Internal Medicine Resident. Rehman Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Maria Fayaz Undergraduate student (MBBS). Rehman Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Faryal Ali Undergraduate student (MBBS). Rehman Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Arsalan Khan Undergraduate student (MBBS). Rehman Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Raza Ullah Undergraduate student (MBBS). Rehman Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Javariya Zafar Undergraduate student (MBBS). Rehman Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Hakeem Ullah Undergraduate student (MBBS). Rehman Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Saiqa Baloch Undergraduate student (MBBS). Rehman Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Sanam Gandapur Internal Medicine Resident. Rehman Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan



Congenital Abnormalities, Nervous System Malformations, Neural tube defects, Folic acid, Consanguinity


Background: Congenital anomalies are a major cause of perinatal and neonatal deaths, both in low- and high-income countries. They are relatively common worldwide, affecting 3% to 5% of live births. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2014 to June 2014 at the Khyber teaching hospital in Peshawar. Specific patient information was obtained from patient records at the beginning of the study. Those individuals found to have at least one birth defect were approached and their attendants (mothers) were interviewed. Information regarding various risk factors was collected. Descriptive analyses were carried out. Results: Out of 1062 deliveries, 2.9% (31) of newborns had various congenital anomalies.b Hydrocephalus (22.6%), anencephaly (12.9%), and spina bifida (9.7%) were major anomalies. The maternal age ranged from 18 years to 46 years (mean: 30 ± 8). Most of the anomalies (35.5%) were present in the 26-30 years age group. Out of 31 babies, 6.4% had multiple anomalies. The preponderance of various congenital anomalies was seen in parity 1 (35.4%); parities 2 to 4 had lower incidences (35.4%). The consanguinity rate was 67.7%; only 32.3% of patients were using folic acid. History of passive smoking was positive in 16.1% of cases. Conclusion: Anencephaly and hydrocephalus were the most prominent anomaly detected; early prenatal diagnosis may be helpful in decreasing mortality by offering early termination. Low intake of folic acid and a high consanguinity rate were the most common associated risk factors for congenital anomalies. These risk factors may be reduced by creating awareness regarding the avoidance....


Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Adnan Khan, Undergraduate student (MBBS). Rehman Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Adnan Khan is a fifth-year medical student of a five-year MBBS program at  Rehman Medical College, Peshawar,Pakistan.


1. Boygle CA, Cordero JF. Birth defects and disabilities: a public health issue for the 21st century. Am J Public Health. 2005 Nov;95(11):1884-6
2. Singh A, Gupta RK. Pattern of congenital anomalies in newborn: a hospital based prospective study. JK Science. 2009 Jan-Mar;11(1):34-6.
3. Bittles AH. Consanguineous marriage: current global incidence and its relevance to demographic research. Ann Arbor(MI): University of Michigan, Population Studies Center; 1990. (Research Report No. 90-186)
4. Kumar MR, Bhat BV, Oumachigui A. Perinatal mortality trends in a referral hospital. Indian J Pediatr. 1996 May-Jun;63(3):357-61.
5. Korejo R, Bhutta S, Noorani KJ, Bhutta ZA. An audit and trends of perinatal mortality at the Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc. 2007 Apr;57(4):168-72.
6. Kalter H, Warkany J. Medical progress. Congenital malformations: etiologic factors and their role in prevention. N Engl J Med. 1983 Feb 24;308(8):424-31.
7. Costa CM, da Gama SG, Leal Mdo C. Congenital malformations in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: prevalence and associated factors. Cad Saude Publica. 2006 Nov;22(11):2423-31.
8. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296.
9. Rankin J, Pattenden S, Abramsky L, Boyd P, Jordan H, Stone D, et al. Preva¬lence of congenital anomalies in five British regions,1991-99. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 Sep;90(5):F374-9.
10. Gul F, Jabin M, Khan AS. Frequency of congenital malformations and associated risk factors at Liaqat Memorial Hospital, Kohat. Khyber Med Univ J. 2012;4(3):119-24
11. Perveen F, Tyyab S. Frequency and pattern of distribution of congenital anomalies in the newborn and associated maternal risk factors. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007 Jun;17(6):340-3.
12. Taksande A, Vilhekar K, Chaturvedi P, Jain M. Congenital malformations at birth in Central India: a rural medical college hospital based data. Indian J Hum Genet. 2010 Sep;16(3):159-63.
13. Movafagh A, Zadeh ZP, Javadi MH, Mohammed FM, Ghaderian SM, Heidari MH, et al. Occurrence of congenital anomalies and genetic diseases in a population of Ghazvin Province, Iran: a study of 33380 cases. Pak J Med Sci. 2008 Jan-Mar;24(1):80-5.
14. Alberta Health and Wellness. Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance
System: ninth report 1997–2009. Edmonton (AB): Alberta Health and Wellness; 2012.
15. Tomatir AG, Demirhan H, Sorkun HC, Köksal A, Ozerdem F, Cilengir N. Major congenital anomalies: a five-year retrospective regional study in Turkey. Genet Mol Res. 2009 Jan 13;8(1):19-27.
16. Shawky RM, Elsedfy HH, Abolouz SK, Labatia GY. Prevalence of congenital malformations in a thousand consecutive Egyptian liveborn. Egypt J Med Hum Genet. 2001;2(1):43-53.
17. Khan SM, Ahmad GS, Abu-Talib A. Are congenital anomalies more frequent in Saudi Arabia? Ann Saudi Med. 1990;10:488-9.
18. Lisi A, Botto LD, Rittler M, Castilla E, Bianca S, Bianchi F, et al. Sex and congenital malformations: an international perspective. Am J Med Genet A. 2005 Apr 1;134A(1):49-57.
19. de Costa CM. Consanguineous marriage and its relevance to obstetric practice. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2002 Aug;57(8):530-6.
20. Rukanuddin AR, Hasan KZ. Maternal and Child Health. In: Pakistan De¬mographic and Health Survey 1990/1991. Islamabad: National Institute of Population Studies; 1992. p. 125-48.
21. Mosayebi Z, Movahedian AH. Pattern of congenital malformations in consanguineous versus non consanguineous marriages in Kashan, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2007 Jul-Aug;13(4):868-75.
22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Folate status in women of childbearing age, by race/ethnicity—United States, 1999-2000, 2001-2002, and 2003-2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007 Jan 5;55(51-52):1377-80.
23. Yoon PW, Freeman SB, Sherman SL, Taft LF, Gu Y, Pettay D, et al. Advanced maternal age and the risk of Down syndrome characterized by the meiotic stage of chromosomal error. a population based study. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Mar;58(3):628-33.
24. Sipilä P, von Wendt L, Hartikainen-Sorri AL. The grand multipara—still an obstetrical challenge? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1990;247(4):187-95.
25. Qazi G. Relationship of selected prenatal factors to pregnancy outcome and congenital anomalies. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010 Oct- Dec;22(4):41-5.
26. Khoury MJ, Erickson JD, Cordero JF, McCarthy BJ. Congenital malformations and intrauterine growth retardation: a population study. Pediatrics. 1988 Jul;82(1):83-90.
27. Leonardi-Bee J, Britton J, Venn V. Secondhand smoke and adverse fetal outcomes in nonsmoking pregnant women: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2011 Apr;127(4):734-41.



How to Cite

Khan, A., Zuhaid, M., Fayaz, M., Ali, F., Khan, A., Ullah, R., Zafar, J., Ullah, H., Baloch, S., & Gandapur, S. (2015). Frequency of Congenital Anomalies in Newborns and Its Relation to Maternal Health in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan. International Journal of Medical Students, 3(1), 19–23.



Original Article