Evaluating the Effectiveness and Complications of Robotic vs Other Surgery Techniques for Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Authors

Keywords:

Robotic Surgical Procedures, Mitral Valve, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve repair and replacement are common critical surgical procedures. Traditional open-heart surgery has long been the standard approach, offering reliable outcomes through direct visualization and access to the heart. However, advancements in minimally invasive techniques, particularly robotic-assisted surgery, have introduced new possibilities in the field of cardiac surgery and benefits to the patients regarding the outcomes and complications. Despite these advantages, the technique requires specialized training and has a steep learning curve, leading to variability in outcomes depending on the surgeon’s experience. This abstract aims to compare robotic mitral valve repair versus other surgical techniques, providing insights into the evolving approaches to performing this procedure.

METHODS: We conducted a search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies comparing robotic surgery with conventional techniques and MIS in patients located in Turkey, Italy, Japan, USA, Australia, Germany, Netherlands, England and China.

RESULTS: Eighteen studies with 16,220 adult patients were included in this project. Hospital stay and complications were significantly shorter than conventional procedures in length of stay and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay. The mean difference of ICU stay of the conventional group was -0.85 days [95% CI -1.22, -0.47] compared to the robotic group. The mean difference of length of stay in the conventional group was -1.34 days [95% CI -2.12, -0.57] compared to the robotic group. The odds ratio of the mortality overall of the two groups was significantly lower with 0.65 [95% CI 0.44, 0.95] compared to the robotic group. However, the robotic group was associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp. Total transfusion rate and overall complications did not show a significant difference.

CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional and MIS procedures, robotic surgery has the advantage of reduced hospital stays, ICU stays and mortality. Therefore, we suggest that surgical decisions should be tailored to each case, considering previous experience. This highlights the importance of personalized evaluations for achieving the best treatment results.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Not apply.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Vidal Valderrama, C. E., Zavala Garcia, R. I., Rivero Moreno, Y., Antunez Perez, R., Acevedo Rodriguez, J. E., Salolin-Vargas, V. P., Trujillo-García, L. D., Saldaña-Ruiz, M. A., Zúñiga González, N. A., Rodríguez-Huerta, V. J., & Cantú Navarro, C. (2024). Evaluating the Effectiveness and Complications of Robotic vs Other Surgery Techniques for Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. International Journal of Medical Students, 12, S409. Retrieved from https://ijms.pitt.edu/IJMS/article/view/2917

Issue

Vol 12. (2024): Supplement 1

Section

Abstracts of the WCMSR

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Carlos Esteban Vidal Valderrama, Ramon Isaac Zavala Garcia, Yeisson Rivero Moreno, Raul Antunez Perez, Jessica Edith Acevedo Rodriguez, Vanessa Pamela Salolin-Vargas, Leopoldo David Trujillo-García, Mauricio Alejandro Saldaña-Ruiz, Noe Alejandro Zúñiga González, Vanessa Jarelly Rodríguez-Huerta, Carolina Cantú Navarro

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
    2. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
    4. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
    5. The Author represents and warrants that:
      1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
      2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
      3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
      4. the Work has not previously been published;
      5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
      6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
    6. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from the Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Enforcement of copyright

The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.

If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.

If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org

 

Infringing material

If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org

Most read articles by the same author(s)