Man Versus Machine: Can Artificial Intelligence Distinguish Between the Quality of Online Health Information on Social Media?

Authors

  • Christian A. Persichetti Fourth Year Medical Student. Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, United States of America.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2023.2287

Keywords:

Ai Artificial Intelligence, Consumer Health Information, Social Media

Abstract

BACKGROUND: ChatGPT is a popular artificial intelligence service offered by OpenAI. It’s utility in assessing quality of online medical information has been investigated by Golan and Ripps et. al. In July 2023, ultimately concluding that ChatGPT was unable to discern poor from high quality information. However, this study focused on information from websites generated from a Google search. To the author’s knowledge, there has been no evaluation of the ability of ChatGPT to stratify the quality of online medical information from social media videos. Two previous studies, by Dhami and Wescott et. al. In May 2023 and Rehman et. al. In 2021, identified differences via manual calculation of DISCERN scores between physician and non-physician Tik-Tok videos on the topic of hidradenitis suppurativa. This study aims to identify whether ChatGPT can distinguish between physician and non-physician health videos pertaining to hidradenitis suppurativa on Tik-Tok via DISCERN score.

METHODS: A similar methodology to Dhami and Wescott et. al. was used in an attempt to capture the same population of videos. A new Tik-Tok account was created to eliminate any previous search bias. The term “#hidradenitissuppurativa” was searched in July, 2023. Videos were filtered by “most-liked.” Inclusion criteria consisted of videos posted prior to October 25, 2022, that did not satisfy the exclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria consisted of videos in a language other than English, duplicated videos, videos that did not offer health advice, or videos deemed irrelevant to hidradenitis suppurativa by the author. Videos included were transcribed by the website TokScript (https://script.tokaudit.io) or by the author if transcripts were not available by that method. ChatGPT was prompted to evaluate transcripts based on the DISCERN criteria, which were copied directly from the Discern Instrument website “Rating this question” pop-up. Each of the 16 question criteria were submitted to ChatGPT separately. Transcriptions were provided to ChatGPT and a DISCERN score was generated. A Shapiro-Wilk test was performed on the sample of DISCERN scores to determine normality. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed between physician and non-physician DISCERN scores.

RESULTS: Of 377 Tik Tok videos returned with the search, 43 satisfied inclusion criteria (11.4%). Of these, 19 (44.2%) were produced by a physician and 24 (55.8%) by a non-physician. Aggregate DISCERN scores were not normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk p < 0.0002). Physician produced videos had a mean DISCERN score of 41.87 with an interquartile range of 26-57. Mean DISCERN score for non-physician produced videos was 24.56 with an interquartile range of 16-30.5. Mann-Whitney U test returned a p < 0.0006.

CONCLUSION: This study suggests that ChatGPT may have the capacity to distinguish high from low quality social media videos to some extent based on the DISCERN score. More evaluation is necessary to elucidate the boundaries of utilizing ChatGPT in this fashion. This has the potential to suggest that polishing this utilization may automate this process in the future, saving valuable time for human researchers in this field.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Golan R, Ripps SJ, Reddy R, et al. ChatGPT's Ability to Assess Quality and Readability of Online Medical Information: Evidence From a Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e42214. Published 2023 Jul 20. doi:10.7759/cureus.42214

Wescott R, Dhami RK, Wang L, Hovenic W. Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Cross-sectional Study of Content Quality on TikTok. Skin. 2023;7(3):802-806. doi:https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.7.3.7

Rehman R, Saad M, Huq F, Oska S, Mehregan D, Daveluy S. A cross-sectional analysis of popular hidradenitis suppurativa content on TikTok. JAAD Int. 2021;5:98-100. Published 2021 Oct 11. doi:10.1016/j.jdin.2021.09.004

TokScript - TikTok Transcript Generator. script.tokaudit.io. Accessed September 16, 2023. https://script.tokaudit.io

DISCERN - The DISCERN Instrument. www.discern.org.uk. http://www.discern.org.uk/discern_instrument.php

Downloads

Published

2023-12-19

How to Cite

Persichetti, C. A. (2023). Man Versus Machine: Can Artificial Intelligence Distinguish Between the Quality of Online Health Information on Social Media?. International Journal of Medical Students, 11, S103. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2023.2287

Issue

Vol 11. (2023): Supplement 1

Section

Abstracts of the WCMSR

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Christian A. Persichetti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
    2. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
    4. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
    5. The Author represents and warrants that:
      1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
      2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
      3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
      4. the Work has not previously been published;
      5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
      6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
    6. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from the Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Enforcement of copyright

The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.

If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.

If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org

 

Infringing material

If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org