The Factors Causing Stress in Medical Students and their Impact on Academic Outcomes: A Narrative Qualitative Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2024.2218Keywords:
Psychological Stressors, Medical Students, Medical School, Analysis , Stress, Academic Outcomes , Systematic Review, Qualitative Analysis , PRISMA Guidelines, Academic Pressure , Institutional Impact, Personality Traits , Social Relationships, Financial Stress , Narrative Review, Emotional Exhaustion , Burnout, Academic Performance , Mental Well-being, Resilience , DepressionAbstract
Background: This study investigated the causes of stress in medical students and the impact of stress on their academic outcomes. Much is known about the impact of stress on medical students but there is a gap in knowledge regarding the collated overview of literature in this area. This study sought to pull together disparate research to gain a clearer overview of the core drivers of stress.
Methods: Taking a meta-level approach, a narrative qualitative systematic review of previous systematic reviews was undertaken, following the PRISMA guidelines. This systematic review covered literature published from 2009-2023 where the focus was stress in students studying at medical schools in the United Kingdom. Findings were then assessed for commonly emerging themes.
Results: From an initial tranche of 3394 articles, a final set of eight systematic reviews was identified. The eight reviews drew on over 309 separate research projects and involved over 500,000 participants. A review of the key findings from each of the eight studies identified five themes: academic pressure, the impact of the institution, students’ personality traits, social relationships, and financial stress. The analysis provided clear evidence that stress amongst medical students results in negative academic outcomes.
Conclusion: The findings suggest a need to reduce stress to help medical students prevent a decline in their academic outcomes and health. From these findings it is recommended that medical schools examine their curriculum to identify areas where they feel they put undue academic pressure on their students and work on ways to remediate this situation.
Metrics
References
1. Cooper C, Dewe PJ. Stress. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons: 2008.
World Health Organisation (WHO). Stress. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/stress#:~:text=Stress%20can%20be%20defined%20as,to%20your%20overall%20well%2Dbeing; updated February 21 2023; cited 28 July 28 2023.
Sutton S, Baum A, Johnston M. The SAGE handbook of health psychology. London: SAGE; 2004.
Salleh MR. Life Event, Stress and illness. Malaysian J Med Sci. 2008;15(4):9-18.
Timmins WG. The chronic stress crisis: How stress is destroying your health and what you can do to stop it. Bloomington: AuthorHouse; 2008.
Mental Health Foundation. UK Stress Survey. London: Mental Health Foundation; 2018.
Office of National Statistics (ONS). Coronavirus and first year higher education students. England: Office for National Statistics; 2021.
Macaskill A. The mental health of university students in the United Kingdom. Br J Guid & Counsel. 2013;41(4):426-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2012.743110
Lane A, McGrath J, Cleary E, Guerandel A, Malone KM. Worried, weary and worn out: mixed-method study of stress and well-being in final-year medical students. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 1;10(12):e040245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040245
Bergmann C, Muth T, Loerbroks A. Medical students’ perceptions of stress due to academic studies and its interrelationships with other domains of life: a qualitative study. Med Educ Online. 2019;24(1):1603526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1603526
Cecil J, McHale C, Hart J, Laidlaw A. Behaviour and burnout in medical students. Med Educ Online. 2014;19(1):25209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v19.25209
Nair P, Keppell MJ, Lim CL, Mari T, Hassan N. Transforming curriculum through teacher-learner partnerships: IGI Global. 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6445-5
Triado XM, Aparicio-Chueca P, Guardia-Olmos J, Jaría-Chacón N, Cebollero MP, Ejjaberi AE. Handbook of research on transnational higher education. Hershey: IGI Global; 2014
Gabbay H, Cohen A, Festinger E. Early predictors of persistence and performance in online language courses. In Glick D, Cohen A, Chang C, editors. Early warning systems and targeted interventions for student success in online courses. Hershey: IGI Global; 2020:200-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5074-8.ch010
Tubulingane BS, Angombe ST. Education quality and offerings intersection post pandemic for inclusive development: a case study. In: Mukerji S, Tripathi P, editors. Handbook of research on global institutional roles for inclusive development. Hershey: IGI Global; 2022:39-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-2448-3.ch003
Rytkönen H, Parpala A, Lindblom-Ylänne S, Virtanen V, Postareff L. Factors affecting bioscience students’ academic achievement. Instr Sci. 2011;40(2):241-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9176-3
Frazier P, Gabriel A, Merians A, Lust K. Understanding stress as an impediment to academic performance. J Am College Health. 2019;67(6):562-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1499649
Brew EA, Nketiah B, Koranteng R. A literature review of academic performance, an insight into factors and their influences on academic outcomes of students at senior high schools. Open Access Libr J. 2021;8(6):1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107423
Humphrey JH. Anthology of stress revisited. New York: Novinka Books; 2005.
Bugaj T, Cranz A, Junne F, Erschens R, Herzog W, Nikendei C. Psychosocial burden in medical students and specific prevention strategies. Ment Health & Prev. 2016;4(1):24-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhp.2015.12.003
Saipanish R. Stress among medical students in a Thai medical school. Med Teach. 2009;25(5):502-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159031000136716
Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Medical student distress: Causes, consequences, and proposed solutions. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2005;80(12):1613-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4065/80.12.1613
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. 2021;88:105906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
Joanna Briggs Institute. Critical appraisal tools. nd. Available from https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools. Last updated February 21 2023; cited 28 July 28 2023.
Schunemann HJ, Brennan S, Akl EA, Hultcrantz M, Alonso Coello P, Xia J, et al. The development methods of official GRADE articles and requirements for claiming the use of GRADE - a statement by the GRADE Guidance Group. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023;159:79-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.05.010
General Medical Council (GMC). Tomorrow's doctors: Recommendations on undergraduate medical education. London: GMC; 2009
Haykal KA, Pereira L, Power A, Fournier K. Medical student wellness assessment beyond anxiety and depression: A scoping review. Plos One. 2022;17(10):e0276894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276894
Polle E, Gair J. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for medical students: a narrative review. Can Med Educ J. 2021;12(2):e74-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.68406
Humble N, Mozelius P. Content analysis or thematic analysis: Similarities, differences and applications in qualitative research. In European conference on research methodology for business and management studies. 2022;21(1):76-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/ecrm.21.1.316
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277-1288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Blair E. A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques. J Methods & Meas Soc Sci. 2015;6(1):14-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2458/v6i1.18772
Atherley A, Dolmans D, Hu W, Hegazi I, Alexander S, Teunissen PW. Beyond the struggles: A scoping review on the transition to undergraduate clinical training. Med Educ. 2019;53(6):559-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13883
Gaston-Hawkins LA, Solorio FA, Chao GF, Green CR. The silent epidemic: Causes and consequences of medical learner burnout. Curr Psych Rep. 2020;22(12):2-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-01211-x
Ahmady S, Khajeali N, Sharifi F, Mirmoghtadaei ZS. Factors related to academic failure in preclinical medical education: A systematic review. J Adv Med Educ & Profess. 2019;7(2):74-85.
Mohmand S, Monteiro S, Solomonian L. How are medical institutions supporting the well-being of undergraduate students? A scoping review. Med Educ Online. 2022;27(1):2133986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2133986
Hancock J, Mattick, K. Tolerance of ambiguity and psychological well-being in medical training: A systematic review. Med Educ. 2020;54(2):125-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14031
Yang L, Yuan J, Sun H, Zhao Y, Yu J, Li Y. Influencing factors of depressive symptoms among undergraduates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One. 2023;18(3):e0279050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279050
Ong RSR, Wong RSM, Chee RCH, Quek CWN, Burla N, Loh CYL, et al. A systematic scoping review moral distress amongst medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03515-3
Pisaniello MS, Asahina AT, Bacchi S, Wagner M, Perry SW, Wong M-L, et al. Effect of medical student debt on mental health, academic performance and specialty choice: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e029980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029980
![The image depicts a stressed medical student surrounded by books and study materials, with swirling lines and exclamation marks symbolizing stress. The background includes elements like a clock and medical symbols to emphasize the academic and medical context](https://ijms.pitt.edu/public/journals/1/submission_2218_2873_coverImage_en_US.png)
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Thensiniya Jeyapalan, Erik Blair
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from the Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Enforcement of copyright
The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.
If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.
If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org
Infringing material
If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org