Exploring The Prevalence and Patterns of Traditional Medicine Use Among the General Population of Conflict-Affected Areas in Sudan 2025, A Cross-Sectional Study
Keywords:
Medicine; Traditional, Armed Conflicts, SudanAbstract
Background: Traditional medicine, which encompasses indigenous health practices such as herbal therapies and spiritual healing, is deeply embedded in the Sudanese culture and has historically served as a primary healthcare resource due to its accessibility and cultural alignment. Following the conflict that began in Sudan in April 2023, the formal medical infrastructure suffered from collapse, with more than half of hospitals in conflict affected regions ceasing operations, forcing Traditional medicine to transition from a complementary practice to a vital survival strategy. Despite its increased importance during this period of severe healthcare disruption and economic hardship, a significant research gap remains regarding the systematic use and patterns of Traditional medicine within active conflict zones. This study investigates the prevalence and sociodemographic factors influencing traditional medicine use across three conflict affected states to evaluate how communities maintain healing practices during a period of total systemic failure.
Methods: A community-based, descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted between February and July 2025. The study was set in three conflict-affected states in Sudan: Khartoum, Al Jazirah, and Kordofan. The target population included adults aged 18 years and older who were residing in these states at the time of the study. Data collection was performed through face-to-face interviews using a validated structured questionnaire. Due to insecurity and mobility restrictions within the conflict zones, a convenience sampling technique was utilized. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 21. Categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and percentages. The relationships between sociodemographic characteristics and the practice of traditional medicine were evaluated using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests.
Results: Among 568 participants, 75.0% reported using traditional medicine since the conflict began. Herbal remedies were the most common practice (86.2%), primarily targeting respiratory and gastrointestinal issues and headaches. Reliance was driven by the high cost (59.9%) and physical insecurity of modern healthcare, with 46.9% citing affordability as a primary motivator and the limited access to adequate medical services. Most users relied on informal information sources and reported perceived symptom relief (73.2%). Usage was significantly associated with sociodemographic factors, including age (p = 0.000), education level (p= 0.002), and displacement status (p= 0.003); 48.8% agreed that traditional medicine had become more reliable due to conflict-related instability.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that armed conflicts reshape healthcare-seeking behavior, driving substantial reliance on traditional medicine as an adaptive strategy, driven by healthcare collapse and economic hardship. High usage across all educational levels highlights its broad relevance beyond socioeconomic factors, though frequent non-disclosure to formal providers poses significant safety risks. These findings underscore the urgent need for conflict-sensitive health policies, pharmacovigilance, public education, and clinical research to ensure the safe, evidence-based integration of traditional practices within conflict-affected healthcare systems.
References
There are no references for the abstract but here is the list of references for the original paper:
1. James C, Peltzer K. Traditional and Alternative Therapy for Mental Illness in Jamaica: Patients’ Conceptions and Practitioners’ Attitudes. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines. 2011 Oct 5;9(1). doi:10.4314/ajtcam.v9i1.14
2. The Role of Traditional Medicine in Primary Health Care. J immunodefic Disord. 2012;01(01). doi:10.4172/2324-853X.1000e101
3. Ahmed SMM, Gasmalha MEA, M. Ahmed AB, Alrawa S, Mohammed KAE, Ahmed MBM. Access and satisfaction with healthcare services among chronic disease patients during the Sudan armed conflict: a cross-sectional study. Confl Health. 2025 Aug 11;19(1):61. doi:10.1186/s13031-025-00703-y
4. Rabih M, Ahmed ABM, Abdelgyoum HA, Elhassan S, Mohamed EEA, Yasin FMO, et al. Availability and readiness of healthcare services at primary healthcare centers during the Sudan war: a cross-sectional study. BMC Primary Care. 2025 Oct 16;26(1):317. doi:10.1186/s12875-025-03015-5
5. Elmukashfi ShamsEldin Elobied H, Bushra Masaad Ahmed M, Balla M. Ahmed A, Abdelrahman Hassan Salih R, Mohammed Mokhtar Ahmed S, M. A. Mahgoub A, et al. Healthcare accessibility, utilization, and quality of life among internally displaced people during the Sudan war: a cross-sectional study. Confl Health. 2025 Mar 1;19(1):11. doi:10.1186/s13031-025-00655-3
6. Omam LA, Jarman E, O’Laughlin KN, Parkes-Ratanshi R. Primary healthcare delivery models in African conflict-affected settings: a systematic review. Confl Health. 2023 Jul 15;17(1):34. doi:10.1186/s13031-023-00533-w
7. Bashir AM. Integration of traditional and modern medicine: a review of Somali healing practices. Ann Med. 2025 Dec 31;57(1). doi:10.1080/07853890.2025.2546057
8. Ahmed GEM, Ahmed EYM, Ahmed AE, Hemmeda L, Birier AB, Abdelgadir T, et al. Prevalence and reasons to seek traditional healing methods among residents of two localities in North Kordofan State, Sudan 2022: A cross‐sectional study. Health Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 22;6(8). doi:10.1002/hsr2.1487
9. Abdalla S, Abdel Aziz M, Basheir I. Seeking care from a traditional healer after injury in Sudan: an exploratory cross-sectional analysis. Int Health. 2020 May 1;12(3):177–83. doi:10.1093/inthealth/ihz063
10. Suleiman MHA. An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used by communities of Northern Kordofan region, Sudan. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015 Dec;176:232–42. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2015.10.039
11. COCHRAN WG. Sampling techniques. Wiley; 1977.
12. Doocy S, Lyles E, Tappis H, Norton A. Effectiveness of humanitarian health interventions: a systematic review of literature published between 2013 and 2021. BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 20;13(7):e068267. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068267
13. Hoenders R, Ghelman R, Portella C, Simmons S, Locke A, Cramer H, et al. A review of the WHO strategy on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine from the perspective of academic consortia for integrative medicine and health. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 11;11. doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1395698
14. Ahmed F, Ballout K, Eldervis H, Eddin AC, Tariq S, Mehmet N, et al. The Practice of Traditional Medicine and Associated Factors in Northwest Syria: A Cross-sectional study. Journal of Health Policy & Outcomes Research. 2021 Jan 21;1/2025:15. doi:10.7365/JHPOR.2025.1.2
15. James PB, Wardle J, Steel A, Adams J. Traditional, complementary and alternative medicine use in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Oct 31;3(5):e000895. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000895
16. Patwardhan B, Wieland LS, Aginam O, Chuthaputti A, Ghelman R, Ghods R, et al. Evidence-based traditional medicine for transforming global health and well-being. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2023 Jul;14(4):100790. doi:10.1016/j.jaim.2023.100790
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hagir Khalid Elshaikh Elagib, Amal Essam Ali Ahmed, Hajar Saad Salih Bashir, Mona Elfadl Mohamed, Ola TagElsir Osman Suliman, Reel Hizabr Ghulamalla Mohammed, Dalia Hassan Mustafa Aldaw, Omer Adel Alblal Ahmed, Rana Elhassan Elbsri Elhaj Mohammed Ahmed, Tyseer Abo Median Altjani Ahmed, Leen Abdulaziz Mohammed Abdulmoniem, Shahd Tag Elsir Eltom Abdalla, Najla Yousif Fadlelmula Mohamd, Nafisa Salim Mohammedelhassan Mohammed, Hamid Issameldin Hamid Magzoub

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from the Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Enforcement of copyright
The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.
If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.
If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org
Infringing material
If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org



