Contiguous Lumbar Bilateral Pars Defects at L3 and L4 (with Intact L5); treated with Pedicle Screw Fixation and Interbody Fusion: A Case Report with Literature Review

Authors

Keywords:

Abstract

Background:

Pars defects of the lumbar spine are very frequently observed in athletes and adults as they are exposed to repetitive spine stress which may result in instability or spondylolisthesis. Although traumatic and degenerative pars defects are well-described in isolated form in literature, the presence of contiguous bilateral pars defects and at adjacent lumbar levels (L3, L4) with intact L5 due to different mechanisms as well is extremely rare. In order to plan surgical stabilization, one needs to be aware of the biomechanical interaction between pre-existing and recent defects.

The Case:

We discuss here a case of a female who is in her forties with a two-year history of lower back pain secondarily to chronic degenerative L4 pars defect. She met with a roadside accident and presented in our hospital with acute lumbar pain and sensory deficits in the L3 and L4 dermatomes, but there was no bladder or bowel involvement. Radiographs showed that she had bilateral L4 pars defect (with grade 2 anterolisthesis) with contiguous bilateral L3 pars defect (traumatic in nature), but the L5 was still intact. L4 pars defect was termed as chronic and L3 was termed as acute. Chronicity of these defects was deduced based on clinical history and intraoperative observations since the patient presented in the emergency department and due to institutional constraints CT scan and MRI could not be contemplated. The patient was operated by means of the anterior pedicle screw fixation at the levels of L3-L5 and L4-L5 including the laminectomy, facetectomy, disc excision, and the insertion of the PEEK cages with bone graft. Postoperatively, she was mobilized and on the second day she was discharged. At two weeks' follow up, there was gradual sensory recovery, improved motor strength, and pain improved from VAS 8/10 to 2/10. Radiographs taken during this period revealed stable hardware, correct positioning and progressive interbody fusion.

Conclusion:

This case underscores a fairly uncommon biomechanical pattern that shows existing degenerative and acute pars defects at adjacent levels. These were due to various mechanisms with sparing lumbosacral junctions. It was intended to be fixed with interbody fusion using posterior pedicle screw fixation. It offered pain relief, neurological recovery and stability of the spine. Awareness of such a typical presentation is very important in order to guide timely surgical intervention and optimum outcomes in patients with contiguous lumbar pars defects.

Author Biographies

Dr Muhammad Rizwan Ali, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan

Department of Orthopedics and Senior Registrar

Dr Muhammad Jawad Saleem, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan

Department of Orthopedics and Spine Surgeon

Dr Ali Shahid, Punjab Medical College, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Department of Orthopedics and Spine Surgeon

Muhammad Suliman Sajid, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan

Department of Orthopedics and Third-Year Medical Student

Dr Sheeza Ahmed, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan

Department of Surgery and Resident Surgeon

Muhammad Haris, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan

Department of Orthopedics and Final-Year Medical Student

Dr Shayan Asmat, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan

Department of Orthopedics and House Officer

Noor Ul Subah Afzal, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan

Department of Orthopedics and Final-Year Medical Student

Khadija Waleed, Nawaz Shareef Medical College, Gujrat, Pakistan

Department of Orthopedics and House Officer

References

Sakai T, Sairyo K, Suzue N, Kosaka H, Yasui N. Incidence and etiology of lumbar spondylolysis: review of the literature. J Orthop Sci Off J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 2010 May;15(3):281–8. doi:10.1007/s00776-010-1454-4 PubMed PMID: 20559793.

2. Gregory PL, Batt ME, Kerslake RW. Comparing spondylolysis in cricketers and soccer players. Br J Sports Med. 2004 Dec;38(6):737–42. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2003.008110 PubMed PMID: 15562169; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1724984.

3. Standaert CJ, Herring SA. Spondylolysis: a critical review. Br J Sports Med. 2000 Dec;34(6):415–22. doi:10.1136/bjsm.34.6.415

4. Leone A, Cianfoni A, Cerase A, Magarelli N, Bonomo L. Lumbar spondylolysis: a review. Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Jun;40(6):683–700. doi:10.1007/s00256-010-0942-0 PubMed PMID: 20440613.

5. Levine AM, Edwards CC. Low Lumbar Burst Fractures Reduction and Stabilization Using the Modular Spine Fixation System. Orthopedics. 1988 Oct;11(10):1427–32. doi:10.3928/0147-7447-19881001-11

Downloads

Published

2026-08-18

How to Cite

Ali, M. R., Saleem, M. J., Shahid, A., Sajid, M. S., Ahmed, S., Haris, M., … Waleed, K. (2026). Contiguous Lumbar Bilateral Pars Defects at L3 and L4 (with Intact L5); treated with Pedicle Screw Fixation and Interbody Fusion: A Case Report with Literature Review. International Journal of Medical Students. Retrieved from https://ijms.pitt.edu/IJMS/article/view/4716

Issue

Section

Abstracts of the WCMSR

Categories